Skip to main content


Formalizing adequacy: A case study for higher-order abstract syntax


James Cheney, Michael Norrish and René Vestergaard

University of Edinburgh


Australian National University



Adequacy is an important criterion for judging whether a formalization is suitable for reasoning about the actual object of study. The issue is particularly subtle in the expansive case of approaches to languages with name-binding. In prior work, adequacy has been formalized only with respect to specific representation techniques. In this article, we give a general formal definition based on model-theoretic isomorphisms or interpretations. We investigate and formalize an adequate interpretation of untyped lambda-calculus within a higher-order metalanguage in Isabelle/HOL using the Nominal Datatype Package. Formalization elucidates some subtle issues that have been neglected in informal arguments concerning adequacy.

BibTeX Entry

    doi              = {10.1007/s10817-011-9221-6},
    journal          = {Journal of Automated Reasoning},
    author           = {Cheney, James and Norrish, Michael and Vestergaard, René},
    number           = {2},
    month            = {aug},
    volume           = {49},
    year             = {2012},
    title            = {Formalizing Adequacy: A Case Study for Higher-order Abstract Syntax},
    pages            = {209--239}